Saturday, July 7, 2012
Thesis
Photography has become a massive art form and done
much for the industry, but without effects, in its most basic form it is simply
evidence or a reminder of what has occurred.
Assignment #4
“The equivalent of
its temporal photography would be a giant film depicting the temporally interconnected
events from every vantage point.” – Kracauer p425
It may have taken four pages of
reading but I finally understood a concept that Kracauer was conveying. The historicists believe that an event cannot
be truly depicted unless EVERY aspect is presented. I like the example he gives in relation to
film that the equivalent would be film with different points of view of the
same event. It reminded me of the movie Vantage
Point in which a bombing was replayed over and over from different
characters’ points of view. The movie
was fairly annoying to see some the same parts but it was an interesting effect
that I had not witnessed.
“A portrait painter
who submitted entirely to “natural necessity” would at best create photographs. During a
particular period, which began
with the Renaissance
and may now be approaching its end,
the ‘artwork’ is indeed faithful
to nature whose specificity reveals itself more
and more during this period. But by penetrating this nature the artwork orients
itself toward ‘higher purposes.’” – Kracauer p427
I understand the point that Kracauer
is making, that to paint something that duplicates the actual object is not too
different than a photograph. But I do
not agree that it is any less artful.
Sure, it may take less of an artistic mind to create such an image but
they are both still art. I guess to
summarize my feeling about this excerpt is that they are separate but equal
forms of art; neither has a “higher purpose.”
Friday, July 6, 2012
Assignment #3
“What is the signifying structure of
‘illustration’? Does the image duplicate
certain of the informations given in the text by a phenomenon of redundancy or
does the text add a fresh information to the image?” – Barthes p273
I have never really
given thought to this question asked by Barthes. What came first the chicken or the egg? I’ve always thought the illustration added to
what the author has written, but it seems that we place a very large emphasis
on images that we might depend on them to substitute our imagination. Obviously, I’m on the fence with this
question. What do you think?
“the operation of the drawing (the coding)
immediately necessitates a certain division between the significant and the
insignificant: the drawing does not
reproduce everything (often it reproduces very little), without its ceasing,
however, to be a strong message; whereas the photograph, although it can choose
its subject, its point of view and its angle, cannot intervene within the
object (except by trick effects). In other words, the denotation of the drawing
is less pure than that of the photograph, for there is no drawing without
style. – Barthes p 277
This
reminds me of a comment I posted on someone’s first blog assignment. It brings up a thought that I have had before
about photography being an art. I feel
that painting, drawing, sketching, etc. a scene or an object to be more of an
art than just photographing it. That is
not to say I don’t appreciate photographs of pretty scenery, because I do and I
will often purchase them in forms of postcards.
I just believe that the time, effort, and talent that it takes to create
such a picture is more valuable than a photograph.
A little off season adjustment that had to be made... I wasn't very happy at first, but I'm still excited to watch football in the fall
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Assignment #2
“Having a photograph of Shakespeare would be likehaving a nail from the True Cross.” – Sontag p154
Sontagfeels very strongly that people hold photographs to be very important. It is true that society places a high valueon pictures, as she later explains; we won’t even throw away pictures out of asort of superstitious belief. I foundthis quote interesting as a Christian/ not a huge Shakespeare fan. Personally I believe that one of three nailsthat held the Messiah to the cross where he died for our sins holds more significancethan a 16th century playwright. I know Sontag wrote this sentence to get a rise and make the readerthink… it worked.
“photography implies instant access to the real. Butthe results of this practice of instant access are another way of creatingdistance.” – Sontag p164
When I first began reading the essay I doubtedthat it would have much relevance as itwas written in 1973, but I find this excerpt to be directly applicable to ourcyber-society. We have access to so muchinformation, including photographs, via the internet. It seems that this easy way to “experience”things has become preferred to actually going outside. It is sad that people prefer watching,viewing, or reading about something than actually going out and doing it.
Max- so excited for the hike up Mt. Pinos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


